Revolt Against Vaccines Leads To Mass Exodus From Texas Colleges

05-25-2012 • www.prisonplanet.com

Hundreds of classes cancelled as ACC loses 10,000 students

Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones
Prison Planet.com
Thursday, May 24, 2012

Infowars has talked to a whistleblower in a senior position at Austin Community College who has divulged that enrollment numbers are collapsing due to students refusing to comply with vaccinations they are told are mandatory in order to take classes.

The ACC administrator told Alex Jones that some 10,000 students have refused to enroll because of their refusal to take inoculations. Although waivers for religious or personal objections are available, the ACC source said students were being given the impression that the inoculations are compulsory.

Indeed, college authorities are lying to students by telling them they will be refused enrolment if they don’t take the shots, according to the source.

Read Full Story

Reported by Donna Hancock

Blatant Corruption Exposed As EU Blocks France’s Ban On Monsanto’s GMO Maize

Anthony Gucciardi
NaturalSociety
May 24, 2012

corruption 235x147 Blatant Corruption Exposed as EU Blocks Frances Ban on Monsantos GMO Maize

Just after France legislators and officials moved to ban Monsanto’s genetically modified strain of GMO maize over environmental and health concerns, the European Union has decided to step in and re-secure Monsanto’s presence in the country — against the very will of the nation itself. This should come as no surprise when considering the fact that the United States ambassador to France, a business partner to George W. Bush, stated back in 2007 that nations who did not accept Monsanto’s GMO crops will be ‘penalized’. In fact, ambassador Craig Stapleton went as far as to say that the nations should be threatened with military-styled trade wars.

That’s right, it appears the reason for the unprecedented move to maintain Monsanto’s deeply-rooted foothold in France has to do with the fact that the United States and other nations are continually pushing Monsanto’s agenda — even going as far as to threaten military-styled trade wars to those who oppose the company. Monsanto has major connections with political heads that have actually threatened trade wars against nations opposed to GMOs on record. As I reported back in January, WikiLeaks cables surfaced revealing and startling information concerning Monsanto’s deep involvement with back-end politics.

One of the most telling details involves a statement made by Craig Stapleton, in which he said:

“Country team Paris recommends that we calibrate a target retaliation list that causes some pain across the EU since this is a collective responsibility, but that also focuses in part on the worst culprits. The list should be measured rather than vicious and must be sustainable over the long term, since we should not expect an early victory. Moving to retaliation will make clear that the current path has real costs to EU interests and could help strengthen European pro-biotech voices.”

And that is not even the most shocking part. WikiLeaks cables go on to state that United States diplomats actually work directly for Monsanto, furthering the agenda of the company across the globe. Is it any wonder that France is being assaulted by the EU over its decision to secure the health of its citizens?

It becomes even more obvious when examining the ridiculous reasoning as to why the EU had to step in and block France’s in-house legislation. The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) rejected the ban on the grounds that “there is no scientific evidence” that shows “risk to human and animal health or the environment.” Of course there is an overwhelming amount of research showing that Monsanto’s creations do in fact threaten not only human health, but the planet as a whole. Even the EPA has warned over the fact that Monsanto’s GMO crops are spawning ‘mutant’ resistant insects and subsequently requiring substantially more pesticides.

Consumers are waking up to Monsanto’s agenda and the dangers associated with their modified creations. Over 45,000 comments were submitted on the USDA website in opposition to Monsanto’s new genetically modified strain, and only 23 in favor. The corruption of Monsanto is now out in the open, and only serves to show how deeply rooted the company is within the United States government. Is it any coincidence that a major head of the FDA was a leading employee of Monsanto?

Source

EU France GMO Maize Monsanto Politics Population Control GMOs/Food

How Chemical Exposure Today Will Influence Behavior Generations Later

May 22, 2012

Researchers at The University of Texas at Austin and Washington State University have seen an increased reaction to stress in animals whose ancestors were exposed to an environmental compound generations earlier. The findings, published in the latest Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, put a new twist on the notions of nature and nurture, with broad implications for how certain behavioral tendencies might be inherited.

The researchers—David Crews at Texas , Michael Skinner at Washington State and colleagues—exposed gestating female rats to vinclozolin, a popular fruit and vegetable fungicide known to disrupt hormones and have effects across generations of animals. The researchers then put the rats’ third generation of offspring through a variety of behavioral tests and found they were more anxious, more sensitive to stress, and had greater activity in stress-related regions of the brain than descendants of unexposed rats.

“We are now in the third human generation since the start of the chemical revolution, since humans have been exposed to these kinds of toxins,” says Crews. “This is the animal model of that.”

“The ancestral exposure of your great grandmother alters your brain development to then respond to stress differently,” says Skinner. “We did not know a stress response could be programmed by your ancestors’ environmental exposures.”

The researchers had already shown exposure to vinclozolin can effect subsequent generations by affecting how genes are turned on and off, a process called epigenetics. In that case, the epigenetic transgenerational inheritance altered how rats choose mates.

The new research deepens their study of the epigenetics of the brain and behavior, dealing for the first time with real-life challenges like stress. It also takes a rare systems biology approach, looking at the brain from the molecular level to the physiological level to behavior.

“We did not know a stress response could be reprogrammed by your ancestors’ environmental exposures,” says Skinner, who focused on the epigenetic transgenerational inheritance and genomics aspects of the paper. “So how well you socialize or how your anxiety levels respond to stress may be as much your ancestral epigenetic inheritance as your individual early-life events.”

This could explain why some individuals have issues with post traumatic stress syndrome while others do not, he says.

Crews says that increases in other mental disorders may be attributable to the kind of “two-hit” exposure that the experiment is modeling.

“There is no doubt that we have been seeing real increases in mental disorders like autism and bipolar disorder,” says Crews, who focused on the neuroscience, behavior and stress aspects of the paper. “It’s more than just a change in diagnostics. The question is why? Is it because we are living in a more frantic world, or because we are living in a more frantic world and are responding to that in a different way because we have been exposed? I favor the latter.”

The researchers also saw intriguing differences in weight gain, opening the door to further research on obesity.

The Most Significant Reason So Many Toxic Chemicals Are Introduced Every Year

Reference Sources 125

Politics Chemical Exposure Toxic Chemicals Population Control

Undercover GMOs Slip Through Labeling Crack

GMOs go Stealth in the Face of Mounting Support for Honest Labeling

Barbara H. Peterson

Farm Wars

In the fight for the safety of our food supply, many are jumping on the bandwagon to get honest labeling for foods that were produced via genetic modification (GMOs). Is this even possible?

The European Union has a GMO labeling directive that can be found here: 1830-2003. Sounds good on the surface, but does it get the job done? No, it doesn’t.

Genetic engineering outside the scope of the labelling directive

Areas in which the application of genetic engineering is very common and often unavoidable are not covered by the labelling directive.

Genetic engineering is a very broad field, and even when organisations, producers, and retailers use the term “GMO-free”, genetic engineering often is involved nonetheless. Therefore, even supermarkets with no products labelled as GMOs may not be free from all types of genetic engineering.

Examples of this are:

Meat, milk, egg, and other animal products from animals fed GM plants. Annually, the EU imports 35 to 40 million tonnes of soy primarily for use as animal feed. Commercially available soy-based feeds generally contain 40-60 percent material from GM plants.

Food enzymes produced with the help of GM microorganisms. Such enzymes are used in the production of cheese, baked goods, juices, wine, grape sugar, and glucose syrup.

Additives, vitamins, and flavours that are produced by GM microorganisms. These substances do not require labelling if they do not possess content from the GM microorganism from which they were produced.

http://www.gmo-compass.org/eng/regulation/labelling/92.gmo_labelling_labelled_goods.html

Full list of items NOT requiring GMO labeling:

http://www.gmo-compass.org/eng/regulation/labelling/88.gmo_labelling_these_products_require.html

To find out what is on the ‘needs to be labeled’ list go here:

http://www.gmo-compass.org/eng/regulation/labelling/51.gmo_labelling_these_products_labelled.html

It would seem that only “certain” GMOs are required to be labeled. Flying under the radar in the face of labeling laws, GMOs are being spread throughout the EU via products from animals that have eaten GM feed, as well as enzymes, additives, vitamins, and flavors that were produced using GM microorganisms, and any other product in which GMOs are “unavoidable.”

If this is what is happening in the EU, can we expect it to be any different for us if/when we finally get around to labeling in the US? Are we too little, too late? Will we soon reach a point where we won’t have to worry about labeling at all because the only non-polluted food supply we will have will be the food we grow at home? You tell me.

Source

Politics GMOs/Food GMO Labeling Population Control

UN & World Bank Strangle Sovereign Nations Into Accepting Global Population Reduction Dictates

Added by louistheguy on May 16, 2012.

infowars,com

According to two subsequent documents put out by the World Bank, its guidelines dictate that in order to qualify for World Bank lending, sovereign nations must implement population reduction objectives as outlined by the World Bank and UN Population Fund. If they refuse, lending will be withdrawn.

Already pre-tested and implemented in Yemen and Niger, these guidelines are destined for global implementation within the next decade, says the World Bank.

In the World Bank’s Reproductive Health Action Plan 2010-2015, published in April of 2010, the Bank speaks of Millennium Development Goal number 5 (or MDG5), which stands for “Reproductive Health” (or RH).

As we know, this is eugenics-new-speak for population control. As pro-death globalist professor John Cleland argued at a 2006 gathering in the company of like-minded individuals from the United Nations Population Fund, the International Planned Parenthood Foundation, the European Commission, the World Bank and Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation:

“It does this cause no service at all to continue to shroud family planning in the obfuscating phrase “sexual and reproductive health”. People don’t really know what it means. If we mean family planning or contraception, we must say it. If we are worried about population growth, we must say it. We must use proper, straightforward language. I am fed up with the political correctness that daren’t say the name population stabilization, hardly dares to mention family planning or contraception out of fear that somebody is going to get offended. It is pathetic!”

The 2010 report put out by the World Bank however, chooses to use this deceptive phrase continually. And, from its dark point of view, it is right to do so- for the resistance against this 21st century eugenics grows steadily. The Bank, just like the UN, has no choice but to cloak itself in deceptive language so as not to raise too much suspicion as they move forward:

“(…) a renewed global consensus on the need to make progress on MDG5, together with greater attention to gender issues within and outside the Bank is refocusing attention on RH and offering an unprecedented opportunity to redress the neglect of the previous decade. Notable among these developments is that in 2007 the UN fully incorporated RH within the MDG framework.”

Apart from all the available evidence of a global push for population reduction, The term Global Consensus alone proves it:

“The Global Consensus”, says the report, “recognizes that MDGs 4 & 5 will not be reached without country leadership and the prioritization of reproductive, maternal, and newborn health at country level. The Global Consensus proposes a five point plan that includes: (i) political, operational, and community leadership and engagement; (ii) a package of evidence-based interventions through effective health systems along a continuum of good quality care, with a priority on quality care at birth; (iii) services for women and children free at the point of use if countries choose to provide them; (iv) skilled and motivated health workers in the right place at the right time, with supporting infrastructure, drugs, and equipment; and (v) accountability for results with robust monitoring and evaluation.”

Speaking of a global consensus. It was Klaus Töpfer, 1996 Bilderberg attendee and former Executive Director of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) who in the year 2000 admitted to an “international consensus” on worldwide population control. During a speech given in Berlin in the beginning of the new millennium, Töpfer stated outright:

“Most people and policymakers are unaware that there is an international consensus that grounds population policy in human rights and development, emphasizing building the capacities of women to manage their own lives.”

In order to translate this international, or global consensus to the nation-states under its control, the World Bank boasts:

“The World Bank is uniquely positioned at the country level to take on advocacy for reproductive health, particularly in reaching Ministers of Finance. This will require utilizing the World Bank‟s economic analysis and technical resources to marshal arguments for investment in reproductive health. Bank’s country directors have key role to play in process of making RH a country priority through their policy dialogue with governments.”

There it is again. The World Bank- as lender- has the dependent nations in a stranglehold. If nations don’t comply with its directions, the Bank can cut the financial lifeline, no problem at all. Or, as its 1984 World Development Report states, the World Bank threatens nations who are slow in implementing the Bank’s “population policies” with “drastic steps, less compatible with individual choice and freedom.”

A World Bank discussion-paper from 2007 called Population Issues in the 21st century: The Role of the World Bank, explains how this process works in more detail:

“The Bank has a potential comparative advantage to address these issues at the highest levels of country policy setting, not only with ministry of health counterparts, but also with officials from finance and planning. This is important given the increasing recognition that political economy is a critical factor in the implementation of population and reproductive health programs, particularly in high-fertility countries.

“Its involvement in many sectors in countries”, the authors continue, “can produce synergies that will allow faster progress than a more narrow focus on family planning services. The Bank will need its partners – United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), World Health Organization (WHO), key bilaterals – to provide technical expertise and administrative knowledge in areas such as procurement of contraceptives, service delivery, and demand creation.”

The document makes clear that this global and coordinated push for total control is not some vague dream. It is already being test-cased in several developing nations. The document states two cases that are currently underway. In the first example, Niger, the World Bank already has in place so-called “benchmarks” that the nation in question has to live up to in order to enjoy the continued support of the World Bank. In the case of Niger, considered by the IMF as a “Highly Indebted Poor Country”- and therefore easy to subdue- the document states:

“Population growth is documented and a population ESW (Economic and Sector Work) planned. A national Population and Reproductive Health Strategy is not only a CAS (Country Assistance Strategy) benchmark, but also a lending trigger, while reproductive health is included in one of the CAS pillars.”

“High fertility and rapid population growth were not only acknowledged as major problems, but fertility was also used as one of the CAS performance benchmarks.

Moreover, a population ESW was planned and subsequently delivered. That ESW has been most instrumental in enhancing the in-country policy dialogue on population issues, and has led to a free-standing International Development Association (IDA) population operation, currently in preparation, which is the first population-specific operation in many years in the World Bank Africa Region. The preparation of a National Population and Reproductive Health Strategy was also a CAS benchmark as well as a lending trigger, while reproductive health was included in one of the CAS pillars. Other Bank partners such as the EU have joined the effort. Finally, population issues have also been given a high priority in the new Rural and Social Policy Reform (Development Policy Lending) Credit.”

The devil is in the details. The extend to which the World Bank and UN are willing to blackmail “Highly Indebted Poor Country’s” in implementing globally coordinated population control policies also becomes obvious in the second test-case example: Yemen:

“In the lending portfolio, restructuring of the Health Sector Reform Project (which includes family planning) is proposed and is expected to lead to a Population II Project to specifically address high fertility and family planning issues. Pillars two and three address population and reproductive health. Contraception is addressed effectively, and CPR is included as a CAS indicator. Furthermore, earlier in 2006, the Bank produced a study on “Promoting the Demand for FP in Yemen.”

“High fertility and rapid population growth”, the document reads, “were not only acknowledged as major impediments to economic growth and poverty reduction, but was included as one of the specific goals that was subsequently translated into policies, programs, and an indicator (reduce population growth rate by 3 percent per annum). Moreover, budget was allocated specifically for each of the four population policies that were outlined.”

The dimensions of this “Global Consensus” are extensive. These diabolical dimensions are being described in the 2007 “Discussion Paper” with the help of the catch-phrase: “Multisectoral approach”:

“A more systematic approach to mainstream population within the core agenda (…) would greatly enhance the adoption of a truly multisectoral approach. (….) The Bank’s comparative advantages in strengthening health systems are mainly in the areas of health financing, system governance, accountability for health service delivery, and demand-side interventions, all of which are important to further the population agenda.”

The authors continue:

“By supporting large-scale implementation of an integrated health sector plan that includes family planning, the Bank can play an important role in keeping family planning as a priority in high fertility and high-population-momentum countries. Even though historically some successful family planning programs were based on a vertical approach, such an approach is now considered less attractive, both from a sustainability standpoint as well as from a comprehensive reproductive health approach.”

However deceptive and “rational” the language, the document is nevertheless strangely upfront about their full-spectrum dominance, to make use of a military phrase:

“Unless population issues are approached in a multipronged fashion, it is unlikely to accelerate a demographic transition in these countries.”

The report goes on to say that: “The Bank is well positioned to systematically include population and reproductive health dimensions in key strategic documents (…). The Bank is particularly well placed to provide the fiscal and economic analysis to ensure that funding of population issues is placed within the overall development financing agenda of the country.”

“This strategy can be best achieved by a coordinated strategy implemented by a visible, strong, and high-level in-country unit with the mandate to design, monitor, and evaluate the effectiveness of the program. The Bank can help strengthen such institutional mechanisms, and foster collaboration with external national or international partners.”

There it is. World Bank “in-country units” will “strengthen” the institutions that distribute the Rockefeller-funded anti-fertility vaccines and GM Food. Above all this, the Bank uses the tools confided to them by the scientific dictatorship:
“The role of political economy in the implementation of population and reproductive health programs and policies is critical. The Bank, by providing the necessary analytical basis for policy discussion, can play a constructive role in prompting policy makers to take action now for future changes in population structure and size.”

Speaking of the scientific dictatorship, the World Bank works in concert with all the other arms of the octopus:
“As was noted in the section on the global policy context, it is impossible for the Bank to work on reproductive health issues without the support and collaboration of the broader international community. The UNFPA is the lead technical agency in the population field, with a large network of field offices. The Bank already uses UNFPA’s contraceptive procurement know-how and has intensified its collaboration in other areas (e.g., training and country program management). The WHO, as the normative agency, is a critical partner at both the global and country levels. As population issues are linked to reproductive health, HIV/AIDS, and child survival, the Bank works also with WHO, UNAIDS, and the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), respectively.”

Returning to the essence, the intention and the strategy leave little for the imagination: a global consensus is in place between all the major transnational institutions and banks: the earth’s population must be brought down, with all means necessary. The World Bank uses financial tools to bring nations on their knees, demanding they cull their numbers; the UN guarantees the political legitimizing for these depopulation policies (Agenda 21); the Foundations develop the anti-fertility vaccines and GM Food, the World Health Organization takes care of the “health-standards” and distribution. With the help of this global construct, carefully coordinated from the top-down, the scientific dictatorship has circled the wagons around all of free humanity.

This first appeared at Jurriaan Maessen’s blog ExplosiveReports.Com.

Read More : infowars.com

Politics Population Control UN World Bank Sovereign Nations World Bank’s Reproductive Health Action Plan 2010-2015 Bilderberg Group Health Sector Reform Project

Body Count: Agenda 21 And The Control Of Food

By Clyde Lewis
theintelhub.com
May 14, 2012

Agenda 21 is a comprehensive plan of action to be taken globally, nationally and locally by organizations of the United Nations System, Governments, and Major Groups in every area in which humans impact the environment.

The purpose of this agenda is to review ways the world can be a better place for sustainable development.

According to the report Habitat II within the agenda– sustainable development consists of a number of suggestions to improve environment.

First in the agenda is to establish a group consensus of crises and solutions that include separating the people and eventually culling them.

This style of commentary was realized in Mein Kampf where Hitler stated that it is important to “sift the human material” for those who support decisions of the leaders and those who do not support these decisions.

One of fundamental ways to do this is to withhold food, or control food stuffs. When a government offers food to a poor country it is never neutral.

It is never an unconditional act of charity. In most cases food can only flow with the consent of the men with power. In poorer countries where the military rules outwardly food is often controlled by the men with guns.

Is it at all surprising that the latest scapegoat is the Obese and how they are now the new target of derision? The Obese consume more than the average human on the planet, they have more health risks and are considered a burden on the idea of global sustainability.

There is in essence a global conspiracy against the obese. It is once again a crisis that has been created by the planners of the global agenda.

It goes against their plan to keep the world order on the brink of starvation. The agenda of the globalists is to tighten the belt on resources and those who consume the most resources will be the first to be considered for the culling.

We should not be surprised in the future that with the poor economy, food will be used as a weapon and that sustenance will be an issue throughout the world. Starvation will run rampant and those who have interest in “sifting the human material” will find it easier to cull the population using food as a weapon.

George Orwell in Both Animal Farm and 1984 pointed out that “health reforms” and the use of food is always a key element in forming fascist tyrannical governments. From 1984 we read that Hierarchical society is only possible on the basis of poverty and ignorance.

This new version is the past and no different past can ever have existed. In principle the war effort is always planned to keep society on the brink of starvation.

We can actually document various mind control events that seem that have shaped our lives and have placed us in the position we find ourselves in today. Many Americans are depressed, are in a state of post traumatic ennui which contributes to a sedentary lifestyle.

They are fed wrong information about nutrition and diet. They are coerced in eating foods that are being called healthy because of vast amounts of lobbying in Washington and the lies that are advertised are immediately believed without discernment.

In the meantime they are part of a nutritional iatrogenic plot to create the body count and cull the populace gradually.

It can be theorized that a Psyops project is underway similar to MK Ultra where things are being introduced gradually into the consensus reality that keep us unhealthy and fearful of our own judgment. Our confidence as a people has been shaken to its very core.

Through terrorism, economic instability, and emotional upheaval, the leadership of the world hold the keys to our survival. They are also holding the keys as to who lives and dies, how they live, who they have sex with, what they eat and how and when they should eat it.

Americans are as ignorant as lab rats and they will do anything to find that last piece of cheese. But what if after all of our efforts we find that the cheese is poisoned?

There is actually literature available on Psychological operations and how they have been tested before on individuals, even communities to see what would happen to their minds in cases of power failures, rumors of disease, and even famine.

One of the latest psychological operations has been going on since September 11th, 2001 and the attacks on the United States.

It has been an interesting acceleration point for watching human behavior and what people are willing to swallow mentally and physically.

Americans would not suspect that there is a secret plan to gradually kill off the populace. They would look at things like high depression rates as normal or childhood diabetes as a sign of the times or even the inability to reproduce as a reason to take more Viagra.

We are being told that no matter our body condition, there is a pill to lower cholesterol, there is a remedy for high blood pressure, and a motorized scooter that can be used when your ability to walk ends because your fat and weak body remains alive because of pharmaceutical companies willing and able to pump you full of drugs rather than encourage healthy eating and movement.

Americans never stop and wonder why there are things like Acid Reflux, or Fibromyalgia and childhood obesity that are chronic and making people sick. Let alone why Cancer is no longer something we escape but have to eventually endure because we simply rationalize that we are living longer. Could it be that the toxicity in our foods and the contaminations are intentional?

I contend that the body count and the increase of Obese Americans has to point to additives, and toxins that we should have never introduced into the food supply.

The best “homeland defense” is to be aware and fund protection of human and agricultural health systems that can detect and deal with whatever comes in. Such an infrastructure would pay for itself. Even without terrorists we are seeing new diseases and even insects that are showing up out of now where devouring and destroying crops.

For a group with patience, a slow-motion disaster in ecological time would be a perfect tactic against an enemy that thinks in terms of days or months, but would suffer across the generations.

The enemy knows that Americans are too caught up in spending billions fighting wars and global warming to do anything about their national health. So it is obvious that our food supply and water supply is vulnerable to attack.

It is the single most unguarded resource in our country right now. It is also the most vulnerable. I know that the word attack may be too harsh, but wouldn’t be considered an attack if people with a lot of money were able to lobby of the idea of additives to food that are neurotoxins to the body?

What if substances that are foreign to the body are given the go ahead for use and the public would be unaware of their toxicity. We have been hearing of the warnings with regard to additives like Aspartame and Senomyx which is cultured in human fetal kidney cells.

We also know that Genetically modified food stuffs are now being used for breakfast cereals and they are being introduced into the food supply. Is it any wonder that our bodies may respond negatively to the toxicity, bloating, reflux, cancers they are all in the picture now and there is no explanation only that humans are not supposed to live as long as they do.

The quality of life the foods we consume are beginning to diminish. Many times now we have heard of people dying in their mid 40’s, or children who have juvenile diabetes, or develop pertussis, or autism or worse.

It is the food we eat and the dugs we consume to give us an excuse to become fatter, sexually inert and unhealthy.

People take pills. Their bodies absorb some of the medication, but the rest of it passes through and is flushed down the toilet.

The wastewater is treated before it is discharged into reservoirs, rivers or lakes. Then, some of the water is cleansed again at drinking water treatment plants and piped to consumers. But most treatments do not remove all drug residues.

And while researchers do not yet understand the exact risks from decades of persistent exposure to random combinations of low levels of pharmaceuticals, recent studies which have gone virtually unnoticed by the general public have found alarming effects on human cells and wildlife.

Our existence is fragile and we are chasing after the wrong things and fighting stupid wars.

The quest for the “bomb” in the middle east has Israel and the US fearful of what might happen. However all nations are currently searching for the capability of designing pathogens and dioxins that target specific races, and countries by virtue of what they choose to put in their bodies.

The resulting morbidity and mortality from the tainting of food stuffs and resources will be accompanied by chaos, governmental and social instability, panic, an extraordinary utilization of available resources and a definite blow to the economy.

You can now bet that these topics will be discussed during the Global sustainability summits and the reports of how the morbidly obese are putting a strain on resources.

In the meantime foods will be suspect, organic foods will be vilified with reports of e-coli, and other possible contaminants because terror is not always packaged with white powder or underwear bombs

The Obesity crisis is a result of trauma. It is the result of cutting corners to feed a population that will be considered a threat to global sustainability

The scapegoating of the obese is very much a dry run for something that will be far more reaching. As we see the failing farms and the food sources that can be affected we must admit that an attack on our poultry, beef and crops will truly be an attack on American Soil.

The proof will not only be in how fat or frail we become, it will be in the body bags that will be used to bury those who will die of exhaustion and toxicity.

This article originally appeared on Ground Zero Media

Agenda 21 Food Control Food Tyranny Police State Politics Population Control

New EO To Eliminate GMO Trade Barriers

Barbara H. Peterson

Farm Wars

The United States, inc., in collusion with the biotech industry, which is headed by none other than Monsanto et. al., is successfully conducting a food war with the nations around it.

The USDA and Monsanto, using international Free Trade agreements as a club, have a penchant for attempting to force other countries under threat of penalty for creating a barrier to free trade, into accepting the unacceptable at their borders, in the form of genetically modified products (GMOs). And now we have the Executive Order on Promoting International Regulatory Cooperation, another tool that can be used to push GMOs worldwide.

On May 1, 2012, the Executive Order on Promoting International Regulatory Cooperation was signed:

Today, President Obama has built on Executive Order 13563 by signing a historic Executive Order on Promoting International Regulatory Cooperation. The new Executive Order will promote American exports, economic growth, and job creation by helping to eliminate unnecessary regulatory differences between the United States and other countries and by making sure that we do not create new ones.

Reducing Red Tape: Regulatory Reform Goes International

From the Trenches reported the following:

Considering the many international security agreements the traitors occupying our highest seats of power have entered into, this latest executive order can absolutely be used to institute gun confiscation laws/regulations, without any consent by our Congress or our Judicial.

Obama Signs Executive Order Declaring International law for the United States

Possible gun control measures are one disturbing aspect of this, but there is another angle here that needs to be addressed. This newest E.O. is designed to promote the goals of Executive Order 13563, which affirmed Executive Order 12866, which established the Regulatory Working Group. One of these goals is to examine strategies for developing international regulatory cooperation particularly in emerging technology areas:

Sec. 2. Coordination of International Regulatory Cooperation. (a) The Regulatory Working Group (Working Group) established by Executive Order 12866 of September 30, 1993 (Regulatory Planning and Review), which was reaffirmed by Executive Order 13563, shall, as appropriate:

(iii) examine, among other things:

(A) appropriate strategies for engaging in the development of regulatory approaches through international regulatory cooperation, particularly in emerging technology areas, when consistent with section 1 of this order;

Executive Order on Promoting International Regulatory Cooperation

Such coordination requires

Eliminat[ing] unnecessary regulatory differences between the United States and other countries and by making sure that we do not create new ones.

Reducing Red Tape: Regulatory Reform Goes International

So, just what “unnecessary regulatory differences” might they be looking to eliminate, or harmonize? You guessed it – the supposed “barriers to trade” that create “unnecessary obstacles” for the biotech industry, because all regulations must be based upon “sound science.”

Over the past year, the Federal Government has been working to implement President Obama’s directions for a 21st-century regulatory system, which he described in Executive Order 13563, “Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review.” Executive Order 13563 requires U.S. regulators, to the extent permitted by law, to select approaches that maximize net benefits; choose the least burdensome alternative; increase public participation in the rulemaking process; design rules that are simpler and more flexible, and that provide freedom of choice; and base regulations on sound science. Executive Order 13563 also calls for an ambitious, government-wide “lookback” at existing rules, with the central goal of eliminating outdated requirements and unjustified costs.

Reducing Red Tape: Regulatory Reform Goes International

This is the same “sound science” that declares GMOs and glyphosate to be safe in the face of mounting evidence to the contrary. Most of this evidence comes from other countries that have done the research and determined that they do not want GMOs. As it stands now, the U.S. cries fowl whenever another country puts up a “barrier to trade” by refusing GMO imports due to this evidence and public outcry.

The newly signed E.O. paves the way for the USDA/Monsanto to bash resistance to biotech infiltration and eliminate or harmonize international regulations to smooth the way for the USDA/Monsanto to have free reign in forcing “emerging technology” down the throats of other nations. This is another step in the total takeover of the planet by biotech interests.

If you are the stronger party, the best way to win is to agree to agree – to coexist. By signing this E.O., Obama has put into play another piece of the world domination puzzle executed by globalist interests looking to spread GMOs unabated, along with their accompanying patents and death grip on farmers worldwide.

Technical regulations and product standards may vary from country to country. Having many different regulations and standards makes life difficult for producers and exporters. If regulations are set arbitrarily, they could be used as an excuse for protectionism.

WTO

All those pesky regulations and sticky red tape that stand as a barrier to trading GMOs worldwide need to be eliminated, and one standard set by international law, to hell with individual concerns.

According to Cass Sunstein, the Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs:

…the order makes clear that in eliminating such differences, we will respect domestic law and will not compromise U.S. priorities and prerogatives. Even while insisting on those priorities and prerogatives, we can eliminate pointless red tape. Today’s global economy relies on supply chains that cross national borders (sometimes more than once), and different regulatory requirements in different countries can significantly increase costs for companies doing business abroad.

Reducing Red Tape: Regulatory Reform Goes International

All of this “red tape” that is spoken of that needs to be “eliminated” is none other than the same type of red tape and barrier to “emerging technology” that was eliminated when GMOs were declared to be “generally regarded as safe” (GRAS) by the USDA, and force-fed to the public under stealth because no labeling is required. Can we spell Codex Alimentarius – full scale harmonization of international food standards with GMOs as the food of choice? We are one step closer to full implementation.

Source

GMOs/Food Monsanto Politics Population Control USDA biotech industry executive order

AGENDA 21: THE END OF WESTERN CIVILIZATION PART 5

By Kathleen Marquardt
May 4, 2012

Part 5 When the RINO becomes the norm

“Disguise thyself as thou wilt, still, Slavery,” said I, “still thou art a bitter draught.” -Laurence Sterne, The Passport

Tennessee passed a resolution, HJR 587, condemning the destructive and insidious nature of the United Nations’ Agenda 21 and reject any affiliated radical policies and any grant monies attached to it. Regretfully, this is a resolution and as such has no teeth; a waste of time considering the 20th anniversary of Agenda 21 is in June when the globalists hope to make A21 hard law. Proponents say that it at least educates the legislators and the people about Agenda 21 and its inherent evils. Much more than a day late and a dollar short.

Also in this legislative session, Bill HB 3571 was proposed which would prohibit the state, counties, towns, and cities from implementing programs of, expending money for, receiving funding from, or contracting with the International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI), also known as ICLEI — Local Governments for Sustainability. Bill SB 3407 would also prohibit the state, counties, towns, and cities from implementing programs of, expending money for, receiving funding from, or contracting with ICLEI.” [link] But these two bills have been shelved for another year.

Why am I pooh-poohing the Tennessee resolution? If it were a law and if that law were to be passed, it would be the greatest achievement of the decade; no, of this century. It would herald the beginning of the end of the destruction of the Great American Experiment, the Constitution and individual freedom. It would say that the spark of freedom was struck in Tennessee. Instead it is just words that are going nowhere. Regretfully this step should have been taken by the mid-1990s. People who are awakening to Agenda 21 now are coming in at the closing credits. It is all over but the shooting.

How did we get here in just 20 years? We didn’t — it took a century, but the denouement came with the Rio Accords in 1992 and again this June. Why didn’t we stop this? Where were our leaders who were supposedly looking our for our best interests, protecting our freedom, sovereignty and, in truth, our very lives?

Where were the Republicans who were fighting for “small government,” for property rights, for the American dream? Let me show you where they were and what they were doing.

Both parties voted to raise the debt ceiling
Both parties voted for Obamacare
Both parties passed NDAA
Both parties voted for H.R. 347 suppressing free speech where secret service are present (for protesting.) i.e., abridgement of freedom of speech
Both parties just voted for CISPA

There are hundreds more examples but you get the picture. The problem is, do you understand that there is NO difference between the Republican Party and the Democrat Party? All of us who give talks about Agenda 21 say, “ this is not a left/right issue; both parties contribute.” But most conservatives cannot get away from wanting the Republicans to get us out of this. How can they when THEY ARE AN EQUAL PART OF THE PROBLEM?

We have to understand that the Republican Party is not our friend and has not been for decades. Read Chey Simonton’s article here (link) and you will have a better understanding of those who have taken control of the Republican party and to where they are leading it.

It was George H.W. Bush who said in February, even months before signing the Rio Accord in 1992, “It is the sacred principles enshrined in the United Nations Charter to which the American people will henceforth pledge their allegiance.”[1] A Republican president proclaiming to the world that we will be pledging our allegiance to a One World Government. Where was the outrage in the Republican Party when all of this was going on? There was none. Why? Because the Republican Party is an equal partner with the Democrat Party behind ALL OF THIS evil.

Yes, there are local Republican officials who are good guys, but they are not part of the leadership; they do not have a say in what the Party stands for nor do they have a say in how the money is spent. So follow the money. It is going to promote legislation that is redistributing our wealth and will make us slaves — those few who are still standing when the smoke clears.

Yesterday I came to the conclusion that it is too late. In June, globalists, UN officials, NGOs, Democrats and Republicans will be in Rio celebrating 20 years of the insidious spreading of this evil, vile program, Agenda 21. They will be making it hard law. That means that the “suggestions” that we reduce our greenhouse gasses to a percentage below the levels we were supposedly producing in 1991. An impossible task; an unnecessary one too. This will be the straw that broke the camel’s back.

This will take us into the Post-Carbon Era. If you haven’t heard of this, you had best get on the web and start finding out what is in store for us. This is not going to be an era that comes spontaneously because of our actions; this has been in the works for decades. Check this out: The Oil Depletion Protocol, (aka the Rimini or Uppsala Protocol) a blueprint for an international agreement to avoid price and supply volatility problems associated with global oil production decline by gradually and collaboratively lowering the global rate of oil production and oil consumption.

There is not a shortage of available oil, but the powers that be, the globalists, etc., have planned (read Agenda 21) the unavailability of oil — at least for the masses. To get up to speed on what the globalists have planned for us, you might want read up on transitions towns, the original one, Totnes, here and the US version here. We are supposed to be excited that we get to descend to a primitive living standard. I am sure that all those Greens who support Earth First! and Dave Foreman are happy as pigs in doo doo. I would love to see how they do when “roughing it” becomes real life not their utopian dream.

Why am I so irate at Republicans? Because you need to understand that if we had real Republicans, and for that matter Classical Liberals, in office we would not be facing this horrible mess now. But it is way too late to belabor this point. Now we have to be figuring out how we intend to insure that civilization can spark again in the New Dark Age into which we are descending. Barbarians drove out the Roman Empire in the Sixth Century, beginning the period called the Dark Age which lasted until the 11th Century.

Now we must put the focus on our local areas. We will be very restricted in the not too distant future vis a vis travel and communication therefore we need to put our time and effort into where we live. Besides all the preparations we must do to insure our food and shelter, we need to try to wrest what governance there is locally away from the globalists.

All of this is planned and has been in the works for a very long time — not decades but closer to a century. And because we weren’t vigilant, we have lost — lost maybe more than we can recover in the foreseeable future. But we must not give up.

We must teach our progeny about the Constitution, the Great American Experiment, and individual freedom so that when the New Dark Age has burned out, they can teach the world what we had and let slip through our fingers because we weren’t vigilant.

Click here for part ——-> 1, 2, 3, 4, 5,

Footnotes:

1. Bush, G.H.W., addressing the UN General Assembly, February 1, 1992.

NewsWithViews.com

Politics AGENDA 21 HJR 587 Population Control Bill HB 3571 The Law ICLEI

So Obummers Science Tsar Admits There Is Chemtrails Then So…

Added by louistheguy on May 4, 2012.

Susanne Posel

John Holdren , Obama’s Science Adviser believes that geo-engineering will assist the planet is stabilizing its weather with regard to global warming.

Holdren sees geo-engineering as a perfectly viable way to cool the planet’s temperature. He fully supports the process of releasing particles of barium, magnesium, aluminum, nano-fibers, bacillus blood spores and other chemicals to reflect sunlight away from the Earth.

In an article released in the Council of Foreign Relations Journal by the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), the organization praised the use of heavy metals into our atmosphere to combat global warming. This reasoning is a hoax, considering that man-made climate change is a lie perpetrated onto the world’s populations by the global Elite and the UN’s IPCC. Scientists worldwide have come to the fact that the sun is heating up not only our Earth, but all the planets in our solar system.

The National Institute of Health has found that geo-engineering is directly responsible for neurotoxins found in human blood, lungs; as well as causing a whole host of neurotoxic conditions such as multiple sclerosis.

Holdren is joining the man-made climate change alarmists who threaten that global warming will not be slowed down in time to reverse the imaginary “tipping point”. One of the claims is that the ice will completely melt in the Arctic; although scientific researchers show that this is blatantly untrue.

A Syracuse University study found that climate change is natural and not caused by man.

The researchers studied the Earth’s heat cycles over 1,000 years in the past until now. They found:

Earth is actually cooling
Arctic ice is not melting
CO2 is not the cause for the extreme weather changes recently seen

Holdren blames human emissions of CO2 as responsible for droughts, food storage shortages, and rising sea levels, along with the extreme weather we have recently seen.

Holdren is not alone in perpetrating this hoax.

The American Meteorological Society is devising a policy statement that will support this lie by saying that “it is prudent to consider geo-engineering’s potential, to understand its limits and to avoid rash deployment.”

Robert Socolow, a Princeton scientist, told the National Academy that geo-engineering should be a readily made viable option in case climate worsens dramatically.

While sound scientific data shows that CO2 is not the problem, other viable perpetrators are ignored. Geo-engineering itself is grossly detrimental to the atmosphere and a direct causation to the major changes we have witnessed in modern decades.

Holdren is upholding Obama’s goal of cutting greenhouse emissions 20% by 2020 and 80% by 2050.

Members of Congress are showing signs of opposing Obama’s bill to achieve this goal.

Holdren’s recent statement is obvious fear-mongering propaganda designed to coerce Capitol Hill and the American public of “truths” surmised by unscientific data.

Read More : occupycorporatism.com

Politics Chemtrails geo-engineering Council of Foreign Relations Population Control HAARP

USDA Knew Of Monsanto GM Alfalfa Contamination In 2005

02 May 2012

By geobear7

Letter Shows Monsanto Planted GMOs Before USDA Approval

By Cassandra Anderson & Anthony Gucciardi

Did Monsanto actually plant genetically modified alfalfa before it was deregulated by the USDA? There is some shocking evidence that, until recently, was withheld from the public showing that Monsanto’s genetically altered alfalfa may have been set free in 2003 — a full two years or more before it was deregulated in 2005. In a letter, obtained by NaturalSociety with permission to post for public viewing, it becomes clear that the USDA may have turned a blind eye to the entire situation, allowing widespread GMO contamination of GMO-free crops.

Amazingly, the letter actually proves that the USDA was fully aware of the situation. In order to fully understand the intricate details of this event, it is first important to understand a few key factors regarding alfalfa and its connection to the entire food supply.

Alfalfa is a perennial plant that grows for more than 2 years and may not need to be replanted each year like annuals. Because it is a perennial plant, it is exceptionally vulnerable to contamination. Interestingly, the modified alfalfa — created by Monsanto in partner with a group known as Forage Genetics — was the first perennial plant to be deregulated for open planting by the USDA. But did Monsanto unleash the plant before this occurred?

This is very serious because it is only a matter of time before alfalfa across America could be corrupted with Monsanto’s patented genetically modified trait. Organic meat and dairy could be tainted when animals are fed the modified alfalfa as well, threatening the very integrity of the organic food supply. What’s more, the contamination of natural alfalfa could be nearly impossible — if not entirely impossible — to remedy, so it could actually fracture the genetic stability of the entire crop on a global scale.

Shocking Letter Reveals Monsanto’s Contamination Dates Back 2 Years Before Deregulation

A letter from Cal/West Seeds shows that evidence of contamination was withheld and the USDA turned a blind eye to proof of contamination in 2005 which shows it was planted at least two years before it was initially deregulated in 2005. As you can see for yourself, the official letter states:

We first discovered the unintended presence of the Roundup Ready gene in our conventional alfalfa seeds in 2005. It was identified in one of our foundation seed production lots grown in California. We tested the foundation seed lot priot to shipping it to a producer who intended to plant it for organic seed production.

In another telling segment, the author writes:

We detected the presence of the … Roundup Ready gene in both our foundation seed and certified seed prior to deregulation.

In order to protect the safety of the individual, some further contents cannot be divulged. Remember in the past, those who have stood up against Monsanto have received anonymous death threats — in one case, the threats were directed towards a mother and her children.

This video documents the timeline of events that led to the deregulation of Monsanto & Forage Genetics’ GMO alfalfa that is contaminating natural alfalfa. As the video explains, the lawyers representing the farmers against Monsanto failed to hold an evidentiary hearing so the injunction (ban) against planting GMO alfalfa was removed and the case was sent back to the lower district court. The lawyers pursued no further action on this case.

Contamination levels are still very low, but will undoubtedly increase over time with unexpected results (like superweeds), so stopping the further planting of GM plants like alfalfa is of high concern. Furthermore, it would set a precedent for banning other GMO perennial plants as well — a monumental move in the legislative fight against GMOs. This letter, compounded with the other evidence presented in this article, is paramount in displaying just how serious of an issue genetic contamination is. What’s more, the USDA appears to have known the entire time. It’s time to spread the word.

Additional Sources:
Alfalfa Timeline of Events
2010 Final Environmental Impact Statement

This article first appeared on NaturalSociety.com. Please visit them for breaking natural health news.

Source

Politics USDA Monsanto GM Alfalfa Contamination Population Control Contaminated Food Supply

If Your Doctor Insists That Vaccines Are Safe, Then Have Them Sign This Form

May 2, 2012

The average person that consents to a vaccine injection, either for themselves or for their children, genuinely believes it is for the betterment of health. What they are not aware of is that even their doctor is likely unfamiliar with the toxic ingredients contained in vaccines which can immediately begin to degrade both short- and long-term health. If your doctor insists that vaccines are safe, then they should have absolutely no problem in signing this form so that you may archive it for your own records on the event of an adverse reaction.

The reality of vaccines is that they are a far greater risk to human health than benefit and always have been. In fact, two centuries of official death statistics show conclusively and scientifically that modern medicine is not responsible for and played little part in substantially improving life expectancy and survival from diseases in developed nations.

In North America, Europe, and the South Pacific, major declines in life-threatening infectious diseases occurred historically either without, or far in advance vaccination efforts for specific diseases.

Whenever I personally inform medical doctors of these realities, many of them are quite shocked with the data. That’s not surprising considering the fact that medical students are still brainwashed that vaccines immunize which is a myth in itself, since natural or “real” immunity can never be artificially induced by a vaccine.

Other misinformed educators also still rely on the myth of herd immunity which is nothing short of medical fraud. It is a shame and embarrassment that brilliant students are deceptively led down the path of ignorance every single year at prestigious medical institutions in the hopes of obtaining an education. These students then become the physicians of a good percentage of the population.

One of the problems we have in a society filled with misinformation about health, is that people sit on the fence. They want to conform to the societal norms ingrained in our minds about conventional medicine, but they also want to stand up for their beliefs and conscience. These fence sitters are made up of those who understand that current vaccination practices are unsafe, yet somehow also believe you can make vaccines safer or more effective. That is where we have to shift the opinions of those who are on the fence and have them fall off on the side of natural health rather than conventional medicine. See my article When It Comes to Vaccines, Don’t Sit On The Fence!

I have previously written that if your doctor cannot answer these 4 questions, don’t vaccinate. Well, if your doctor does make an attempt to answer these questions and a verbal response and statement is not satisfactory for your own peace of mind, then your doctor should be at least willing to provide you with his or her personal declaration of the safety and efficacy of the vaccines he or she (or attending physician or nurse) is about to inject in your or your child’s body. Effectively, this becomes your doctor’s warranty that the risk factors he or she has identified justify the recommended vaccinations with the benefits exceeding the risks.

Physician’s Warranty of Vaccine Safety Form

The following form was adapted from Ken Anderson’s original. Perhaps you can find a physician that will sign it because I have no record of that ever happening:

Download PDF English
Physician’s Warranty of Vaccine Safety

Download PDF Espanol
Garantia Medica para la Seguridad en las Vacunas

PHYSICIAN’S WARRANTY OF VACCINE SAFETY

I (Physician’s name, degree)_______________, _____ am a physician licensed to practice medicine in the State/Province of _________. My State/Provincial license number is ___________ , and my DEA number is ____________. My medical specialty is _______________

I have a thorough understanding of the risks and benefits of all the medications that I prescribe for or administer to my patients. In the case of (Patient’s name) ______________ , age _____ , whom I have examined, I find that certain risk factors exist that justify the recommended vaccinations. The following is a list of said risk factors and the vaccinations that will protect against them:
Risk Factor __________________________
Vaccination __________________________
Risk Factor __________________________
Vaccination __________________________
Risk Factor __________________________
Vaccination __________________________

I am aware that vaccines may contain many of the following chemicals, excipients, preservatives and fillers:

* aluminum hydroxide
* aluminum phosphate
* ammonium sulfate
* amphotericin B
* animal tissues: pig blood, horse blood, rabbit brain,
* arginine hydrochloride
* dog kidney, monkey kidney,
* dibasic potassium phosphate
* chick embryo, chicken egg, duck egg
* calf (bovine) serum
* betapropiolactone
* fetal bovine serum
* formaldehyde
* formalin
* gelatin
* gentamicin sulfate
* glycerol
* human diploid cells (originating from human aborted fetal tissue)
* hydrocortisone
* hydrolized gelatin
* mercury thimerosol (thimerosal, Merthiolate(r))
* monosodium glutamate (MSG)
* monobasic potassium phosphate
* neomycin
* neomycin sulfate
* nonylphenol ethoxylate
* octylphenol ethoxylate
* octoxynol 10
* phenol red indicator
* phenoxyethanol (antifreeze)
* potassium chloride
* potassium diphosphate
* potassium monophosphate
* polymyxin B
* polysorbate 20
* polysorbate 80
* porcine (pig) pancreatic hydrolysate of casein
* residual MRC5 proteins
* sodium deoxycholate
* sorbitol
* thimerosal
* tri(n)butylphosphate,
* VERO cells, a continuous line of monkey kidney cells, and
* washed sheep red blood

and, hereby, warrant that these ingredients are safe for injection into the body of my patient. I have researched reports to the contrary, such as reports that mercury thimerosal causes severe neurological and immunological damage, and find that they are not credible.

I am aware that some vaccines have been found to have been contaminated with Simian Virus 40 (SV 40) and that SV 40 is causally linked by some researchers to non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and mesotheliomas in humans as well as in experimental animals. I hereby warrant that the vaccines I employ in my practice do not contain SV 40 or any other live viruses. (Alternately, I hereby warrant that said SV-40 virus or other viruses pose no substantive risk to my patient.)

I hereby warrant that the vaccines I am recommending for the care of (Patient’s name) _______________ do not contain any tissue from aborted human babies (also known as “fetuses”).

In order to protect my patient’s well being, I have taken the following steps to guarantee that the vaccines I will use will contain no damaging contaminants.

STEPS TAKEN: _________________________
_______________________________________
_______________________________________
_______________________________________

I have personally investigated the reports made to the VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) and state that it is my professional opinion that the vaccines I am recommending are safe for administration to a child under the age of 5 years.

The bases for my opinion are itemized on Exhibit A, attached hereto, — “Physician’s Bases for Professional Opinion of Vaccine Safety.” (Please itemize each recommended vaccine separately along with the bases for arriving at the conclusion that the vaccine is safe for administration to a child under the age of 5 years.)

The professional journal articles I have relied upon in the issuance of this Physician’s Warranty of Vaccine Safety are itemized on Exhibit B , attached hereto, — “Scientific Articles in Support of Physician’s Warranty of Vaccine Safety.”

The professional journal articles that I have read which contain opinions adverse to my opinion are itemized on Exhibit C , attached hereto, — “Scientific Articles Contrary to Physician’s Opinion of Vaccine Safety”

The reasons for my determining that the articles in Exhibit C were invalid are delineated in Attachment D , attached hereto, — “Physician’s Reasons for Determining the Invalidity of Adverse Scientific Opinions.”

Hepatitis B

I understand that 60 percent of patients who are vaccinated for Hepatitis B will lose detectable antibodies to Hepatitis B within 12 years. I understand that in 1996 only 54 cases of Hepatitis B were reported to the CDC in the 0-1 year age group. I understand that in the VAERS, there were 1,080 total reports of adverse reactions from Hepatitis B vaccine in 1996 in the 0-1 year age group, with 47 deaths reported.

I understand that 50 percent of patients who contract Hepatitis B develop no symptoms after exposure. I understand that 30 percent will develop only flu-like symptoms and will have lifetime immunity. I understand that 20 percent will develop the symptoms of the disease, but that 95 percent will fully recover and have lifetime immunity.

I understand that 5 percent of the patients who are exposed to Hepatitis B will become chronic carriers of the disease. I understand that 75 percent of the chronic carriers will live with an asymptomatic infection and that only 25 percent of the chronic carriers will develop chronic liver disease or liver cancer, 10-30 years after the acute infection. The following scientific studies have been performed to demonstrate the safety of the Hepatitis B vaccine in children under the age of 5 years.
____________________________________
____________________________________ _____________________________________

In addition to the recommended vaccinations as protections against the above cited risk factors, I have recommended other non-vaccine measures to protect the health of my patient and have enumerated said non-vaccine measures on Exhibit D , attached hereto, “Non-vaccine Measures to Protect Against Risk Factors” I am issuing this Physician’s Warranty of Vaccine Safety in my professional capacity as the attending physician to (Patient’s name) ________________________________. Regardless of the legal entity under which I normally practice medicine, I am issuing this statement in both my business and individual capacities and hereby waive any statutory, Common Law, Constitutional, UCC, international treaty, and any other legal immunities from liability lawsuits in the instant case. I issue this document of my own free will after consultation with competent legal counsel whose name is _____________________________, an attorney admitted to the Bar in the State of __________________ .
_________________________ (Name of Attending Physician)
______________________ L.S. (Signature of Attending Physician)
Signed on this _______ day of ______________ A.D. ________
Witness: _________________ Date: _____________________
Notary Public: _____________Date: ______________________

=================================================

I’m really anxious to hear back from any readers whose doctor decides to sign this document in an effort to satisfy your peace of mind. I also have lengthy list of legal professionals who are very curious as well.

Dave Mihalovic is a Naturopathic Doctor who specializes in vaccine research, cancer prevention and a natural approach to treatment.

Reference Sources

Politics Forced Vaccines Doctor Signature Form Population Control

Obama’s Science Adviser Says Chemtrails Will Save The Planet… Here’s How…

Posted: May 1st, 2012 by Militant Libertarian

by Susanne Posel, Occupy Corporatism BIN

John Holdren , Obama’s Science Adviser believes that geo-engineering will assist the planet in stabilizing its weather with regard to global warming.

Holdren sees geo-engineering as a perfectly viable way to cool the planet’s temperature. He fully supports the process of releasing particles of barium, magnesium, aluminum, nano-fibers, bacillus blood spores and other chemicals to reflect sunlight away from the Earth.

In an article released in the Council of Foreign Relations Journal by the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), the organization praised the use of heavy metals into our atmosphere to combat global warming. This reasoning is a hoax, considering that man-made climate change is a lie perpetrated onto the world’s populations by the global Elite and the UN’s IPCC. Scientists worldwide have come to the fact that the sun is heating up not only our Earth, but all the planets in our solar system.

The National Institute of Health has found that geo-engineering is directly responsible for neurotoxins found in human blood, lungs; as well as causing a whole host of neurotoxic conditions such as multiple sclerosis.

Holdren is joining the man-made climate change alarmists who threaten that global warming will not be slowed down in time to reverse the imaginary “tipping point”. One of the claims is that the ice will completely melt in the Arctic; although scientific researchers show that this is blatantly untrue.

A Syracuse University study found that climate change is natural and not caused by man.

The researchers studied the Earth’s heat cycles over 1,000 years in the past until now. They found:

Earth is actually cooling
Arctic ice is not melting
CO2 is not the cause for the extreme weather changes recently seen

Holdren blames human emissions of CO2 as responsible for droughts, food storage shortages, and rising sea levels, along with the extreme weather we have recently seen.

Holdren is not alone in perpetrating this hoax.

The American Meteorological Society is devising a policy statement that will support this lie by saying that “it is prudent to consider geo-engineering’s potential, to understand its limits and to avoid rash deployment.”

Robert Socolow, a Princeton scientist, told the National Academy that geo-engineering should be a readily made viable option in case climate worsens dramatically.

While sound scientific data shows that CO2 is not the problem, other viable perpetrators are ignored.Geo-engineering itself is grossly detrimental to the atmosphere and a direct causation to the major changes we have witnessed in modern decades.

Holdren is upholding Obama’s goal of cutting greenhouse emissions 20% by 2020 and 80% by 2050.

Members of Congress are showing signs of opposing Obama’s bill to achieve this goal.

Holdren’s recent statement is obvious fear-mongering propaganda designed to coerce Capitol Hill and the American public of “truths” surmised by unscientific data.

Source # 1

Source # 2

Politics HAARP Chemtrails Obama Regim geo-engineering CFR Population Control IPCC John Holdren

Monsanto Products To Avoid And Boycott Monsanto Products To Wear, Use

28 Apr 2012

By Michael Brownstein
Project Agent Orange

During the American War on Viet Nam, we boycotted Dow Chemical, forcing it to change many of its ways of doing business. Like the present day Dow, Monsanto has products that are integrated into much that we use, but we can avoid some of those items with a conscious boycott.

Ethical Investing has posted a list of specific products to boycott, along with your avoidance of most processed foods since they contain genetically modified organisms.

And, check out these Boycott Monsanto products at Cafe Press.

Monsanto Products to Avoid

Products to Avoid Further Information Alternatives Aspartame (NutraSweet, Equal)

Aspartame Formaldehyde Poisoning & Health Destruction Healthier Sweetener Resource List

Roundup Herbicide Monsanto’s Toxic Roundup &

Scientists Issue Urgent Warning Lawn & Garden Care Solutions (scroll down)

Genetically Engineered Soy & Canola Products & Ingredients (Roundup Treated)

Genetically-Engineered Frankenfoods &

Scientists Issue Urgent Warning Certified Organic Foods rBGH Dairy rBGH (Posilac) — Breast Cancer and Prostate Cancer List of non rBGH Dairy

& Check Local Health Food Store for Organic Dairy Ambien

Insomnia Medication Zolpidem Warning Label Information

Natural Alternatives Where Possible: HealthWorld Solutions, Ayurvedic Info & Meditation or YogaClasses.

If you have a Facebook account, you can also sign a petition demanding justice and compensation for the victims of Agent Orange.

Also see the website, Monsanto Boycott and see OCA’s Boycott Kellogg’s page for information on Monsanto’s genetically modified sugar.

Spread the word, by sporting a Boycott Monsanto magnet on your car, or by wearing a boycott shirt, hoodie, ipod cover, bag and much more.

Source

Politics Boycott Monsanto GMOs Population Control

Can We Continue To Justify Injecting Aluminum Into Children?

Added by louistheguy on April 27, 2012.

greenmedinfo.com

A new report published in the Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology raises a disturbing possibility: that aluminum hydroxide, the dominant metal-based adjuvant used in vaccines today, is causing aluminum overload at injection sites, and contributing to the pathogenesis of diseases such as chronic fatigue syndrome, macrophagic myofasciitis and subcutaneous pseudolymphoma. [i]

Discussed is the case of a 45-year old woman with vaccine-induced subcutaneous pseudolymphoma, a type of skin lesion characterized by collections of lymphocytes, macrophages, and dendritic cells in the skin. The researchers performed a skin biopsy at the injection site and found aluminum (AI) deposits in her macrophages. When the skin sample was assayed for AI and quantified, it was found to contain 768.1 micrograms per gram, dry weight, versus 5.61 and 9.13 in two control patients – up to 153-fold higher concentrations.

The report cautioned: “Given the pathology of this patient and the high Al concentration in skin biopsy, the authors wish to draw attention when using the Al salts known to be particularly effective as adjuvants in single or repeated vaccinations. The possible release of Al may induce other pathologies ascribed to the well-known toxicity of this metal.”

As referenced, aluminum-based (and other) vaccine adjuvants are “effective” at increasing antibody titers, but they perform this feat through the hypersensitization and/or dysregulation of the humoral pole of the immune system (Th2), which is the immunological equivalent of kicking a beehive.

While intrinsically toxic adjuvants enable manufacturers to produce more antibodies with less antigen (often a profit-motivated decision), these synthetically-generated increases in the sheer number of antibodies produced does not in any way guarantee they will target the correct antigen (i.e. antibody-antigen affinity), which is the true measure of vaccine effectiveness; in fact, these unnaturally stimulated antibodies cross-react with and/or attack self-structures, e.g. myelin basic protein, leading to the break down of immunological self-tolerance, i.e. autoimmunity.

It is a curious fact of vaccine history that while aluminum hydroxide has been injected into billions of people and has been used for almost one century as the only vaccine adjuvant approved worldwide, its mechanism of action is not fully understood, and is only being investigated with any depth in the past five years.

We know that one way in which aluminum hydroxide induces an enhanced immune response is through activating the inflammasome within myeloid cells, a key immune-mediated activator of the inflammatory response and which is known to induce cell death. And yet, without understanding its exact mechanism of action, it is impossible by principle to ascertain fully its risk to health.

Last year, a report published in the journal Current Medicinal Chemistry titled “Aluminum vaccine adjuvants: are they safe?” raised these safety concerns:

Aluminum is an experimentally demonstrated neurotoxin and the most commonly used vaccine adjuvant. Despite almost 90 years of widespread use of aluminum adjuvants, medical science’s understanding about their mechanisms of action is still remarkably poor. There is also a concerning scarcity of data on toxicology and pharmacokinetics of these compounds. In spite of this, the notion that aluminum in vaccines is safe appears to be widely accepted. Experimental research, however, clearly shows that aluminum adjuvants have a potential to induce serious immunological disorders in humans. In particular, aluminum in adjuvant form carries a risk for autoimmunity, long-term brain inflammation and associated neurological complications and may thus have profound and widespread adverse health consequences. In our opinion, the possibility that vaccine benefits may have been overrated and the risk of potential adverse effects underestimated, has not been rigorously evaluated in the medical and scientific community. [ii]

Another study published in 2011 in the Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry brought up the taboo topic of vaccine-induced autism, focusing on the crucial role of aluminum adjuvants as neurotoxic agents. The study abstract is well worth reading, as you will not see this type of information reported anywhere in the mainstream media:

Autism spectrum disorders (ASD) are serious multisystem developmental disorders and an urgent global public health concern. Dysfunctional immunity and impaired brain function are core deficits in ASD. Aluminum (Al), the most commonly used vaccine adjuvant, is a demonstrated neurotoxin and a strong immune stimulator. Hence, adjuvant Al has the potential to induce neuroimmune disorders. When assessing adjuvant toxicity in children, two key points ought to be considered: (i) children should not be viewed as “small adults” as their unique physiology makes them much more vulnerable to toxic insults; and (ii) if exposure to Al from only few vaccines can lead to cognitive impairment and autoimmunity in adults, is it unreasonable to question whether the current pediatric schedules, often containing 18 Al adjuvanted vaccines, are safe for children? By applying Hill’s criteria for establishing causality between exposure and outcome we investigated whether exposure to Al from vaccines could be contributing to the rise in ASD prevalence in the Western world. Our results show that: (i) children from countries with the highest ASD prevalence appear to have the highest exposure to Al from vaccines; (ii) the increase in exposure to Al adjuvants significantly correlates with the increase in ASD prevalence in the United States observed over the last two decades (Pearson r=0.92, p<0.0001); and (iii) a significant correlation exists between the amounts of Al administered to preschool children and the current prevalence of ASD in seven Western countries, particularly at 3-4 months of age (Pearson r=0.89-0.94, p=0.0018-0.0248). The application of the Hill’s criteria to these data indicates that the correlation between Al in vaccines and ASD may be causal. Because children represent a fraction of the population most at risk for complications following exposure to Al, a more rigorous evaluation of Al adjuvant safety seems warranted.[iii]

Another, even more taboo topic is vaccine-induced infant death, which is often forced into the “idiopathic” category of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS). A report published in the Journal of Tropical Medicine in 2011, offers an explanation for the well-known, though often censored link between DTP vaccines used in the third world and increased mortality in female infants.[iv]

Titled “Immunological Links to Nonspecific Effects of DTwP and BCG Vaccines on Infant Mortality,” researchers reported on the fact that “A number of mainly observational studies suggest that many African females below the age of one year die each year from the nonspecific effects of vaccination with diphtheria-tetanus toxoids and killed (whole-cell) Bordetella pertussis (DTwP).”

The explanation they offered is that “…the adverse effects of DTwP vaccine may occur because of the Th2-polarising effect of the aluminium phosphate adjuvant in the vaccine and because intramuscular administration of the vaccine may cause chronic inflammation at the site of injection.”

Aluminum has no known beneficial function in biology. Increasing awareness of this metal’s role in breast cancer, due to its metalloestrogenic properties, and its prevalence in our food (baking soda), body care products (e.g. antiperspirants), drugs and environment (e.g. it is used in aerosolized form in military operations as aluminized chaff), is bringing to light how important it is to avoid unnecessary exposures, especially when it concerns the health of our infants and children who are already faced with an ever-increasing body burden of this, and other highly toxic metals. It is clear that if we implement the precautionary principle, vaccines which contain this, or any other, highly toxic metal should be avoided at all costs.

Posts tagged "Population Control"

Revolt Against Vaccines Leads To Mass Exodus From Texas Colleges

Blatant Corruption Exposed As EU Blocks France’s Ban On Monsanto’s GMO Maize

How Chemical Exposure Today Will Influence Behavior Generations Later

Undercover GMOs Slip Through Labeling Crack

UN & World Bank Strangle Sovereign Nations Into Accepting Global Population Reduction Dictates

Body Count: Agenda 21 And The Control Of Food

New EO To Eliminate GMO Trade Barriers

AGENDA 21: THE END OF WESTERN CIVILIZATION PART 5

So Obummers Science Tsar Admits There Is Chemtrails Then So…

USDA Knew Of Monsanto GM Alfalfa Contamination In 2005

If Your Doctor Insists That Vaccines Are Safe, Then Have Them Sign This Form

Obama’s Science Adviser Says Chemtrails Will Save The Planet… Here’s How…

Monsanto Products To Avoid And Boycott Monsanto Products To Wear, Use

Monsanto Products to Avoid

Can We Continue To Justify Injecting Aluminum Into Children?

Other relevant articles

New Study: Vaccinated Children Have 2 To 5 Times More Diseases And Disorders Than Unvaccinated Children